PEACE and TOLERANCE, cost's us NOTHING, Lets ALL just do it. These are my View's and the Material's, that I have received from emails and when I surf the Internet. I do NOT and WILL NEVER approve of any form of terrorism (doing or promoting), In any Place on this Earth, especially in The OCCUPIED Palestinian Land.
May The Creator of ALL thing's grant us peace and Tolerance for All
New HorizonsClick to go there Web Site
Based in St. Anne’s-on-the-Sea,
As New Horizons’ regulars know, although our presentations are
informative and entertaining, quite a few are
also extremely controversial. And that’s deliberate.
We like to engage speakers who can stir the “grey matter”
a little!... and, as important, challenge the Establishment view of
Rock the boat!
we take great care to source speakers who are respected
for their knowledge and experience, but nothing should be taken as
“gospel”. We do not promote or endorse the views expressed by
our speakers. New Horizons’ principal purpose is to encourage
debate, personal research and critical thinking about topics of
interest to all free-thinking people. Indeed, we sometimes invite different speakers
to give differing views about a topic in order
to encourage healthy debate.
It goes without
saying – well, maybe not in this increasingly “Health &
Safety” crazy world! – that on matters of health, finance and
the law, it’s important to see the presentations principally as springboards
for our own thoughts, research and conclusions.
don’t think that is hard to answer. The government doesn’t want private
citizens or unsupervised university people discovering anything,
because that would be dangerous. Suppose they discover the next new
weapon? If they weren’t patriotic, they might try to keep it for
themselves, causing “havoc”. For this reason, we may assume that physics
was split after the war into real physics and physics for mass
consumption. The best people were culled off the top of the physics
departments, handpicked by insiders, and put to work for the military or
with some perceived public relations skills, like those in wheelchairs
or those with good hair or those who could write salable books or those
who could speak well in public were drafted to lead fake physics. But
they were instructed to stay off-topic. Don’t do any real physics. Don’t
try to solve any real problems, even if they don’t at first seem to
have any military application. Talk about airy, unprovable things like
black holes and the first seconds of the universe and the edge of time
and strings and vacuum fluctuations. As much as possible, push physics
into sci-fi topics, since people love that stuff. Time travel and
wormholes and backward causality. Study Star Trek and Star Wars for
examples. Look at Asimov.
This has the added benefit of
misdirecting those who can see through the fake physics and math. If
they spend all their time responding to the absurdities of the fake
physicists, they won’t spend any time actually solving physical
problems. This will act as insurance that they never accidentally catch
up with our boys in the military, or surpass them.
also explain the chorus of abuse that independent researchers run up
against. The government doesn’t want any independent research because,
again, it is dangerous. Those heckling the independent researchers don’t
really care about protecting the fake physicists, since those guys are
just a front. They are protecting the military physicists you don’t hear
about, the ones doing the real work. Again, if the independent
researchers spend their time arguing with internet trolls, they have
less time to do actual work, and it is less likely they will discover
anything our boys in the military haven’t already discovered.
have the real physicists already discovered all the things I have
written about? Maybe. I assume that all the real brains are hidden away
somewhere—since they certainly aren’t in plain sight—so maybe they have
already unwound everything I have and more. But possibly not. These guys
are going to be kept very busy with applied physics, since it will be
thought that new weapons are more likely to come out of applied physics
than theoretical physics. In my experience, physicists pressed to create
new hardware, software, or industrial products, including weaponry, are
very unlikely to think to tear apart the old equations and start over.
It probably won’t occur to them to tear apart Newton’s Principia like an
old watch and rebuild it, as I have. It won’t occur to them to rebuild
Laplace and Lagrange, comb Relativity from the ground up, or to look for
mathematical flaws in QED or QCD. After all, I have done all that and
haven’t yet developed a better pop-gun, so what do they care? They would
say, “Give me something I can use.”
If that is the case, it also
explains my freedom, and my lack of competition. The type of problems I
am working on apparently only interest scientific purists, and we are a
dying breed, it would seem.
Just getting to the end of this
paper leaves me thinking, “Of course physics has been diverted by the
government. It was diverted by the Manhattan Project and never
un-diverted. How could you have missed this for so long?” Which leads me
to two other realizations. One, a lot of mid-level physicists in the
universities apparently haven’t yet had this epiphany that I just had.
It appears that only the top physicists are “encouraged” to misdirect
the field, and the field just goes along with it. This suits the
just fine, because it limits those they have to control. The government
controls the top, and the top controls the middle, and so on. Two, if
mainstream physics is is utter misdirection, then I don’t have to waste
any more time debating it. If you debate propagandists, you are just
falling for their tricks. After all, how can you debate something like
virtual particles? As I said before, you don’t debate physicists who
start talking about virtual particles, you boot them out of the lab as a
nuisance. I suggest the mid-level physicists at the universities do
just that. I can’t be bothered to sully my boots.
suggest that I have uncovered a fantastic journalism project here, if
there are any real reporters left in the world. Operation Mockingbird
was eventually uncovered by Deborah Davis and Carl Bernstein and others.
This Operation Ostrich, where the biggest brains in physics are taken
permanently underground after the Manhattan Project, would be an even
bigger nut to crack. Piecing together a bunch of disparate facts like I
have done will start the stone rolling, but the theory won’t be proved
until we get what these previous reporters got: interviews or documents.
Research like that isn’t really my forté or interest, so unless someone
dumps some documents in my lap, I will probably leave it to others.
*http://old.disinfo.com/archive/pages/article/id1415/pg2/index.html or Deborah Davis, Katharine the Great. 1979 ** “The CIA and the Media”, Carl Bernstein, Rolling Stone, 1977 http://milesmathis.com/control.pdf
Food fraud is on the rise.
And it’s very poorly regulated.
The result: What’s on the label is very often what you’re not getting.
Who is doing something about it?
Not the government, they’re cutting regulations and enforcement.
Supermarkets clams to be “concerned.” And we all know what that means.